Tej Narayan Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74872 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-286 Year-2019 Thana- BARHARA District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Tej Narayan Rai Son of Late Yamuna Rai Resident of Village - Lala Ka Tola (Panditpur), P.S.- Barahara, District- Bhojpur (Ara) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bachan Jee Ojha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs.Madhuri Lata, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Barahara P.S. Case No. 286 of 2019, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 308, 504 and 234 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner is alleged to have given spade blow on the head of informant.

It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner that there is case and counter case. Admittedly, there is land dispute between the parties. Injuries found on the person of informant to be simple in nature. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner above-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74872 of 2019(2) dt.25-11-2019 2/2 named, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur (Ara) in connection with Barahara P.S. Case No. 286 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with further conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.

(ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T