← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/4647/2019disposed

Anil Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2025-06-27Mr. Justice Nani Tagia2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4647 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11648 of 2019 ====================================================== Anil Kumar Singh S/o Late Lallu Singh, R/o Village- Badyoga, P.O.- Ropahatha, Hathni, P.S.- Nokha, District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

Mr. Pankaj Dixit, District Magistrate, Sasaram, Rohtas. 3.

Mr. Satyabir Singh, Superintendent of Police, Sasaram, Rohtas. 4.

Mr. Rajkumar Gupta, Sub- Divisional Officer, Sasaram, Rohtas. 5.

Mr. Mr. Navratan Chandra, Officer-in- Charge, Nokha Thana, Distt.- Rohtas. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vishal Saurabh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Manish Kumar, GP-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA ORAL ORDER 27-06-2025 This contempt petition has been filed alleging violation of the order dated 19.06.2019 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 11648 of 2019, whereby the respondent No. 2 therein / the District Magistrate, Sasaram, Rohtas was directed to take final decision on the claim of the petitioner for grant of arms license in terms of their own policy as well as 2016 Rules at the earliest.

2. Opposite Party No. 2 / the District Magistrate, Sasaram, Rohtas has filed the show cause, wherein, in paragraph No. 6 it has been stated that the application for grant of arms license to the petitioner was considered in the light of the Arms Act as well as the Rules made thereunder and upon due

Patna High Court MJC No.4647 of 2019(2) dt.27-06-2025 2/2 consideration of the same the application for grant of arms license to the petitioner was rejected.

3. In view of the above, I find that the dated 19.06.2019 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 11648 of 2019 has been complied with by the Opposite Parties.

4. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands closed and disposed of.

(Nani Tagia, J) Narendra/- U