Ganesh Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.53200 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -114 Year- 2016 Thana -BIKRAMGANJ District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================
1. Ganesh Sah S/o Sidhnath Sah resident of village - Jonhi (Mahavirganj Tola), P.S. - Bikramganj, District - Rohtas.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhaskar Shankar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Fahimuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-09-2018 Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was dismissed twice vide order dated 05.05.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 13928 of 2017 and vide order dated 20.12.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 57583 of 2017 in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 114 of 2016 and there is allegation against the petitioner is of assaulting the informant by means of farsa and also snatching Rs. 50,000/-.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that there is case and counter case between the parties and the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 23.01.2017 and there is no likelihood of conclusion of trial in near future. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53200 of 2018 (2) dt.05-09-2018 2/2 the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge -IVth, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 114 of 2016, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T