← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./83504/2023allowed

Ghanshyam Kumar Jha @ Tinku Jha v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-04Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83504 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-297 Year-2023 Thana- BIBHUTIPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Ghanshyam Kumar Jha @ Tinku Jha Son Of Sri Shiv Chandra Jha Resident Of Village- Dih Tabhaka, Ward No. 9, Ps- Bibhutipur, Distt- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akhileshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 04-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the FIR, informant is engaged in Bharat Gas Agency as delivery boy. During his working hours, two miscreants intercepted his pickup van and on pistol point snatched his collected amount of Rs. 44,000/- and mobile and thereafter fled away.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Neither the petitioner is named in the FIR not put on TIP. There is no eye witness of the alleged occurrence. Nothing has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83504 of 2023(2) dt.04-01-2024 2/2 recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Petitioner was remanded in this case from another case on 22.09.2023 and since then he is in custody.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M. Rosra, Samastipur in connection with Bibhutipur P.S. Case No. 297 of 2023.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U