Rajesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84726 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-50 Year-2024 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Rajesh Kumar S/O Tarun Prasad Resident of Village- Kabaiya Chowk, P.SKabaiya,Distt-Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Raja Ram Sudhanshu S/o Late Bishundeo Yadav R/o village-Katehar, P.S.- Suryagarha, District- Lakhisarai ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Amrendra Kumar, Advocate Mr. Gyanendra Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Raive Ranjan Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-03-2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 336(3) and 338 of the B.N.S. and Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the I.T. Act.

3. As per prosecution case, this petitioner is agent of National Insurance Company Limited and it is alleged by the informant that this petitioner sent a link on his mobile for payment and when informant paid Rs. 1,495/- on the said link, the same was credited in the account of this petitioner instead of account of the company.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84726 of 2024(4) dt.20-03-2025 2/3

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. As a matter of fact, informant paid Rs. 1,495/- into account of some other person by mistake and this petitioner is not liable for the mistake committed by the informant. However, later on, petitioner has returned the alleged amount to the informant and a compromise petition to this effect, signed by both parties, has also been filed. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant does not dispute the contentions raised on behalf of the petitioner and confirms the fact regarding settlement between the parties.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, compromise between the parties and clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Lakhisarai in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84726 of 2024(4) dt.20-03-2025 3/3 connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 50 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T