Raja Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78932 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-210 Year-2025 Thana- MAKER District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Raja Singh S/O Late Jagarnath Singh R/O Village- Pure Chhapra, P.S- Parsa, Distt.- Saran at Chapra.

2.

Luv Kumar S/O Raja Singh R/O Village- Pure Chhapra, P.S- Parsa, Distt.- Saran at Chapra.

3.

Rani Devi D/O Raja Singh R/O Village- Pure Chhapra, P.S- Parsa, Distt.- Saran at Chapra.

4.

Babita Devi D/O Raja Singh R/O Village- Pure Chhapra, P.S- Parsa, Distt.- Saran at Chapra.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate.

For the State :

Mrs. Renu Kumari, APP.

For the Informant : Dr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Advocate. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-12-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Maker P.S. Case No. 210 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS.

3. As per the allegation made in the F.I.R., the petitioners along with other co-accused are said to have assaulted the informant causing injury on different parts of his

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78932 of 2025(2) dt.03-12-2025 2/3 body and also snatched Rs. 31,800/- from his pocket.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case. They are innocent and they have committed no offence as alleged. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is general and omnibus and specific allegation of assault is against co-accused Ankush Kumar. The injuries sustained by the victim is not attributable to the petitioners. The petitioners have clean antecedent. Learned counsel further submits that the he will advise his client to return back the entire amount to the informant.

5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant and learned APP for the State have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the nature of allegation made against the petitioners to be general and omnibus and the fact that the injuries sustained by the victim are not attributable to the petitioners and the petitioners undertake to return back the entire amount to the informant, the petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78932 of 2025(2) dt.03-12-2025 3/3 (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Saran at Chapra in connection with Maker P.S. Case No. 210 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C / 482(2) BNSS.

7. The District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and if it is found that the petitioners are involved in some other cases as what has been stated in Para-3 of the bail petition, this order will automatically lose its force.

8. The bail application stands disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) mantreshwar/- U T