Dayanand Dubey @ Daya Dubey @ Daya @ Chhotey v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80262 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-399 Year-2025 Thana- NAUBATPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Dayanand Dubey @ Daya Dubey @ Daya @ Chhotey, S/O Vishwanath Dubey, R/O Vill.- Mahuar, P.S.- Bihta, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Samrendra Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Lalan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 03-12-2025 Heard Mr. Samrendra Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Lalan Kumar, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 399 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.
3. The case of the prosecution is that arms were recovered from the house of one Pappu Kumar @ Avinash Kumar.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He was in custody at that time. His name has surfaced in this case as Pappu Kumar @ Avinash Kumar has stated that this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80262 of 2025(2) dt.03-12-2025 2/2 petitioner has sold certain articles after taking from him. It has further been submitted that since the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of six cases, he has been framed in this case. Nothing has been recovered from his possession. He is languishing in judicial custody since 31.07.2025.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State has also conceded to the argument of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the recovery has been made from the house of Pappu Kumar @ Avinash Kumar.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-VI, Danapur in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 399 of 2025.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T