← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./84779/2024allowed

Nitish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-03-07Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84779 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-122 Year-2024 Thana- NIMCHAKBATHANI District- Gaya ====================================================== Nitish Kumar Son of Late Ramanand Yadav @ Ram Nandan Yadav R/oVillage- Dhaknapar, PS- Nimchak Bathani, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Umesh Kumar Mr. Abhishek Anand Mr. Shubhankar Raj Mr. T.N. Siddiqui Ms. Sristy Patel For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 07-03-2025 Heard Mr. Umesh Shankar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, learned APP for the State. 2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 325, 307, 379, 504 of the Indian Penal Code. 3.

As per the FIR, the allegation against the petitioner is that he and other co-accused persons assaulted the informant and his family members due to which they sustained injuries. 4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84779 of 2024(3) dt.07-03-2025 2/2 omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that though one of the injury was found grievous in nature but the petitioner is not the author of the said injury. The nature of injury caused by the petitioner is simple. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. 5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his/her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Nimchak Bathani P.S. Case No.122 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T