Gorakh Yadav @ Sukhdev Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85661 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2024 Thana- Sinha District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Gorakh Yadav @ Sukhdev Yadav, S/O Late Yodha Yadav, Resident of VillageKalyanpur, P.S.- Sinha, District- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raju Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajendra Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 20-03-2025 Heard Mr. Raju Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Rajendra Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Sinha P.S. Case No. 11 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the son of the informant has gone to school, but he was not feeling well that is why the teacher sent him back to home but he did not return to house for considerable time. On 21.03.2024 in the evening, the informant gave information to the Police Station. On 22.03.2024, the villagers informed to him that dead body of his son, namely, Abhay Kumar was lying in the wheat field.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. The F.I.R. was

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85661 of 2024(3) dt.20-03-2025 2/2 lodged against unknown miscreants. During course of investigation, this petitioner has given his confessional statement. It has come there in the F.I.R. that there was some dispute between the deceased and the son of the petitioner in the school due to which the son of the informant was threatened of dire consequences. In the confessional statement, this petitioner has confessed his guilt. There is nothing except the confessional statement against the petitioner. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 30.03.2024.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara in connection with Sinha P.S. Case No.11 of 2024.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T