Pintu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.55091 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -208 Year- 2018 Thana -TEKARI District- GAYA ======================================================
1. Pintu Kumar, Son of Bangali Prasad @ Naresh Prasad, resident of Village Raniganj, P.S. Tekari, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramashish For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt Indu Kumari Srivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-10-2018 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Tekari P.S.Case no.208 of 2018 registered for offences punishable under 36(A) of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner is of kidnapping of the minor daughter of the inforamnt, however, submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that statement of the girl has been recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. and she has stated her age as 20 years and has not supported the prosecution case. The petitioner is in custody since 8.6.2018.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55091 of 2018 (2) dt.10-10-2018 2/2 enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of ACJM VIth court, Gaya in connection with Tekari P.S.case no.208 of 2018.
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T