Khushboo Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5032 of 2024 ====================================================== Khushboo Kumari Wife of Gautam Kumar Resident of Village- Ashadhi, Police Statin- Mufassil, District- Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social and Welfare Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, I.C.D.S., Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Divisional Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya, Bihar. 4.

The District Magistrate, Nawada, Patna.

5.

The District Programme Officer, ICDS, Nawada, Government of Bihar, Patna.

6.

The Block Development Officer, Nawada Sadar, Nawada, Bihar. 7.

The Child Development Project Officer, Nawada Sadar, Nawada, Bihar. 8.

Anku Kumar Wife of Navin Kumar Resident of Village- Ashadhi, Ward No. 10, Police Station- Mufassil, District- Nawada. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Aryan Singh, Advocate Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sunil Kr. Mandal, SC-3 Mr. Bipin Kumar, AC to SC-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 04-04-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That the present writ application is being preferred on behalf of the above-named petitioner for setting aside the order dated 22.06.2023 passed by Divisional Commissioner Magadh Division, Gaya, in ICDS Revision Case No. 122 of 2022 whereby and whereunder the revision

Patna High Court CWJC No.5032 of 2024(2) dt.04-04-2024 2/2 filed by the petitioner has been dismissed and the order dated 01.07.2022 passed in Appeal No. 01 (Misc.) Selection 2022 by the District Programme Officer, Nawada and the order dated 22.12.2021 passed in Appeal No. 01 (Misc.) Selection 2021 by the Child Development Project Officer, Nawada Sadar, Nawada. And/ or for any other reliefs to which the petitioner found to be entitled in the course of hearing of this writ application."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a suit before the Ld. Civil Court having competent jurisdiction, for redressal of the aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U