← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./80769/2025bail granted

Md Akil Ahmad @ Md Akil @ Akil Mian v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-24Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80769 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-651 Year-2025 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR SADAR DistrictMuzaffarpur ====================================================== Md Akil Ahmad @ Md Akil @ Akil Mian Son of Md. Yusuf R/o Village - Majhauliya, Khetal, P.S. - Sadar, District - Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== For the Petitioner :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate Ms. Vaishnavi Singh, Advocate Mr. Ritwik Thakur, Advocate For the Stat :

Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-11-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S..

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that on 23.07.2025, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner, intercepted husband of informant and fired upon him due to which he died and thereafter, all the accused persons fled away while firing.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80769 of 2025(2) dt.24-11-2025 2/3 behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. From bare perusal of the F.I.R. it is apparent that specific accusation of firing upon husband of informant is against co-accused Md. Tufaila and Md. Kapil. So far as this petitioner is concerned, he is not the assailant of the deceased and he is only alleged to have fired from the pistol while fleeing away. No specific accusation of overt act has been alleged against this petitioner.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation and fact that petitioner is not the assailant of the deceased, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 651 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80769 of 2025(2) dt.24-11-2025 3/3 the B.N.S.S..

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T