Raju Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80475 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-223 Year-2025 Thana- BARACHATTI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.
Raju Yadav S/o Lekha Yadav R/o Village- Dulamdih, PS- Barachatti, Distt.- Gaya 2.
Surendra Yadav S/o Uttam Yadav R/o Village- Dulamdih, PS- Barachatti, Distt.- Gaya 3.
Bilash Yadav @ Vilash Yadav S/o Budhan Yadav R/o Village- Dulamdih, PS- Barachatti, Distt.- Gaya 4.
Vijay Yadav S/o Etwar Yadav R/o Village- Dulamdih, PS- Barachatti, Distt.- Gaya 5.
Lekha Yadav S/o Indradeo Yadav @ Inder Yadav R/o Village- Dulamdih, PS- Barachatti, Distt.- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Md. Javed Jafar Khan For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Madan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 23-02-2026
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners no.1, 2, 4 and 5 and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner no.1, 2, 4 and 5 apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 190, 115, 76, 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) of the B.N.S./Indian Penal Code.
3. By order dated 28.01.2026 injury report of the injured was called for but then the same till date has not been received.
2/4
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on the date when the anticipatory bail application was filed, he was not having the copy of the injury report but now he has a copy of the injury report and from perusal of the same, it would manifest that the injury suffered by the injured has been opined to be simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance except for the injury of Shailendra Yadav with regard to whom opinion with regard to injury no.1 is reserved and the injury no.2 has been opined to be simple.
5. Learned counsel submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 12.06.2025 at 8.30 P.M. he was waiting for his brother Lalu along with mother and Baliram near the house of Raju, when 15 named accused persons including the petitioners came and started abusing his mother, on protest, Raju with sword and Surendra with khanti assaulted causing injury on head, thereafter Sanjay and Lallan acted inappropriately with his wife, further Bilas assaulted Kamaldeo and his mother with khanti, lathi and danda causing injury on head of Kamaldeo and his mother became unconscious, when villagers gathered, the accused fled threatening.
6. Learned counsel submits that petitioners have been
3/4 falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that petitioners and informant are related and are having dispute relating to property. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that as far as petitioner no.4 and 5 are concerned, the allegations against them are general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that as recorded hereinabove, the injury of Lila Devi, Devkaliya Devi and Kamal Yadav have been opined to be simple in nature and as far as Shailendra Yadav is concerned, the injury no.2 has been opined to be simple but with regard to injury no.1 i.e. lacerated wound of size 1 inch x 1⁄2 inch skin deep over frontal area of scalp is reserved but then it is submitted that Bilas is alleged to have assaulted Kamal Dev with khanti, lathi, danda, which appears to be improbable that a person would assault two persons at a time with different weapon. It is also submitted that petitioners will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove their innocence.
7. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
8. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners no. 1, 2, 4 and 5,
4/4 above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Barachatti P.S. Case No.223/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
9. The injury report produced by the learned counsel for the petitioners is taken on record.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T