← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./81588/2025allowed

Golu Kumar @ Sudhanshu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-08Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81588 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-261 Year-2025 Thana- CHAUTHAM District- Khagaria ====================================================== Golu Kumar @ Sudhanshu Kumar S/O Pappu Singh R/O Village- Kevta, P.SChautham, Distt.- Khagaria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Chandrasen Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 08-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Choutham (Beldour) P.S. Case No. 261 of 2025, instituted under Sections 8(C)/20(b)(ii)(b)/29 of the NDPS Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, on getting secret information that a person riding on a motorcycle has kept Ganja in his dickey, police team arrested him who disclosed his name as Rajesh Kumar. On search of dickey of motorcycle, 2kg Ganja was recovered. The apprehended person disclosed that the said contraband was received from Krishna Mohan Yadav and was to be delivered to Golu Kumar (Petitioner).

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81588 of 2025(2) dt.08-01-2026 2/2 case on the disclosure statement of co-accused Rajesh Kumar. Petitioner is a young boy aged about 24 year having no criminal antecedent. Petitioner has no concern either with the co-accused Rajesh Kumar or with the motorcycle used in the occurrence. Petitioner was not present on the spot. The recovered Ganja does not come under the commercial quantity. Petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the investigation and trial.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submission of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge (N.D.P.S.) Act cum Sessions Judge at Khagaria (Bihar) in connection with Chautham (Beldaur) P.S. Case No. 261 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482

(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.), 2023. (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) rakhi/- U T