Patna High CourtCR. MISC./58616/2018dismissed

Paras Nath Paswan And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2018-09-20Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.58616 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-152 Year-2018 Thana- BARUN District- Aurangabad ======================================================

1. Paras Nath Paswan, son of Durga Paswan

2. Baban Paswan, son of Late Anurudha Paswan

3. Lalesh Paswan @ Kalesh Paswan, son of Late Anurudha Paswan

4. Bishun Paswan @ Vishun Paswan, son of Prabhu Paswan

5. Gandhi Paswan, son of Prabhu Paswan

6. Sangita Devi , wife of Gandhi Paswan

7. Bina Devi, wife of Parasnath Paswan

8. Parsunath Paswan @ Parsu Paswan, son of Durga Paswan

9. Sonu Paswan, son of Paras Paswan All are resident of village- Janpur, P.S.- Barun, DistrictAurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Sri Yugal Kishore For the Opposite Party/s :

Sri Bhanu Pratap Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-09-2018 Heard Sri Yugal Kishore, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

Nine petitioners, apprehending their arrest in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 152 of 2018, G.R. No. 1371 of 2018, registered for the offence under Section 147/149/341/323/324/308/354/379/504 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 , have prayed for grant of bail in the event of their arrest or surrender.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58616 of 2018(2) dt.20-09-2018 2/2 was case and counter case in between the parties. From the petitioners side earlier a case was lodged vide Barun P.S. Case No. 149 of 2018 , which was lodged on 25.07.2018 and after more than seven days with a view to create a defence the present F.I.R. was lodged. He further submits that injuries which were allegedly caused were noticed as simple in nature, and as such, a prayer has been made for granting anticipatory bail.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.

Besides hearing, I have perused the F.I.R. in which there is specific accusation against petitioners, and as such, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail.

The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to all the petitioners stands dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) praful/- U T