Dhananjay Jha @ Kari Jha v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83280 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-77 Year-2023 Thana- HAYAGHAT District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.
DHANANJAY JHA @ KARI JHA SON OF VIJAY KUMAR JHA 2.
AMAN KUMAR JHA @ MONU JHA SON OF SANJIV JHA @ SANJEET KUMAR JHA 3.
SHEKHAR KUMAR JHA @ SHEKHAR JHA SON OF RANDHIR JHA 4.
SOURAV KUMAR JHA @ SOURAV JHA SON OF RANDHIR JHA 5.
GOURAV KUMAR JHA @ NIKKU JHA SON OF RANDHIR JHA All RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - WARD NO. 6 HATHAURI, P.S. - HAYAGHAT, DISTRICT - DARBHANGA ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vinay Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Mohammed Arif, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 21-02-2024
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to make rectification in the description of the petitioners in course of the day.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
4. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 353, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83280 of 2023(3) dt.21-02-2024 2/2
6. Allegation against the petitioners is that they intercepted a marriage procession and created nuisance and even tried to set free one arrested accused, namely, Diwakar Jha who was found in drunken condition.
7. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners in a mechanical manner came to be implicated when the allegation against them is not of consuming alcohol and the allegation is general and omnibus in nature also.
8. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
9. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Hayaghat P.S. Case No. 77 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T