Anil Rai @ Anil Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.57970 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -236 Year- 2018 Thana -PIRO District- BHOJPUR ======================================================

1. Anil Rai @ Anil Ray Son of Indradeo Rai, resident of Village- Bachari, P.S. Piro, District Bhojpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Piro P.S.Case No. 236 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 25 (1-B) a/26 of the Arms Act. As per F.I.R. allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of one country made pistol with live cartridges from the possession of the petitioner and accordingly, seizure list has been prepared.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that no incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner rather there is joint family house and the petitioner has no knowledge about the said arms and the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57970 of 2018 (2) dt.28-09-2018 2/2 petitioner is in custody since 19.07.2018 .

Heard learned A.P.P. also, who opposes the prayer for bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, at this stage, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, however once charge has been framed and trial commence, he will be released to the satisfaction of the trail court on condition that he will co-operate in disposal of trial. This application is accordingly disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T