Krishna Chandra @ Dr. Krishna Chandra v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82602 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-526 Year-2024 Thana- MADHAURAH District- Saran ====================================================== Krishna Chandra @ Dr. Krishna Chandra S/o- Jwala Prasad Shahi R/v- Ander Kila SDO Road, Near Panchayat Bhawan, Ps- Town Thana Dist- Vaishali, Presently Posted as Incharge, Referral Hospital, Marhowrah ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Sr. Advocate Mr. Rahul Singh, Advocate Mr. Avinash Kumar, Advocate Mr. Adarsh Parashar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Yogendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 05-12-2025 Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Marhowrah P.S. Case No. 526 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 465, 466, 467, 468, 471, 120B of the IPC.

3. As per allegation, one Babita Devi lodged a case after fabricating forged and frivolous injury report. The doctors of Chapra Hospital and staffs who were involved in manufacturing of forged injury report, have been made accused. The FIR itself shows that Dr. Rajiv Ranjan and Dr. R.N. Tiwari have issued the forged injury report. The complicity of clerk, Ranjit Kr. Singh and Manzoor Alam was also found in fabricating the injury report.

4. The learned senior counsel for the petitioner has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82602 of 2025(2) dt.05-12-2025 2/2 submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. He has further submitted that the petitioner was transferred from another hospital and he took charge of his office from Dr. Rajiv Ranjan. Except that, there is nothing against the petitioner to show his involvement in the present case. The petitioner is a person of clean antecedent.

5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. The petitioner is not the person who fabricated the injury report and there is nothing against him neither in the FIR nor in the case diary, showing his involvement.

7. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Marhowrah P.S. Case No. 526 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C./ 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) priyanka/- U T