Anil Kumar @ Anil @ Anii Yadav @ Anil Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79316 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-202 Year-2025 Thana- RAMPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.
Anil Kumar @ Anil @ Anii Yadav @ Anil Yadav S/O Suraj Prasad R/O Village- Chiraiyatar, P.S- Rampur, Distt.- Gaya. 2.
Aniket Kumar @ Ankit Kumar @ Guddu Kumar @ Guddu S/O Anil Kumar @ Anil @ Anii Yadav R/O Village- Chiraiyatar, P.S- Rampur, Distt.- Gaya. 3.
Sunita Devi W/O Anil Kumar @ Anil @ Anii Yadav @ Anil Yadav R/O Village- Chiraiyatar, P.S- Rampur, Distt.- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Aryan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 05-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Rampur P.S. Case No. 202 of 2025, instituted under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 352, 74, 351(2)(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.
3. As per the prosecution case, petitioners abused and assaulted the informant when he had gone to connect his electricity. The accused persons also assaulted the wife and children of the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79316 of 2025(2) dt.05-01-2026 2/2 case. Except Section 303(2) of the B.N.S., other Sections are bailable in nature and Section 303(2) of the B.N.S. is not applicable against the petitioners. Both the parties are own brothers and due to partition suit some altercation took place in which both the parties got injured. There is case and counter case between the parties. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Petitioners undertake to co-operate in the investigation and trial.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submission of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gayaji in connection with Rampur P.S. Case No. 202 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.), 2023.
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J.) rakhi/- U T