Sonu Keshwani v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79564 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-119 Year-2025 Thana- SACHIVALAYA District- Patna ====================================================== Sonu Keshwani S/o Hemant Keshwani R/o Chaudhary Market, Near Patna Central School, Police Station- Ram Krishna Nagar, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Aryan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 11-12-2025 Heard Mr. Aryan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sachiwalaya P.S. Case No. 119 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 30.05.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 351(3) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.
3. According to prosecution case, this petitioner assaulted to the informant by means of iron rod over a petty dispute due to which he received head injury.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. Although there is specific allegation against the petitioner that he has assaulted to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79564 of 2025(2) dt.11-12-2025 2/3 informant but the injury report of the informant suggest that the injury is simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance. Apart from that, occurrence took place on 29.05.2025 but the F.I.R has been instituted on 30.05.2025 i.e. after delay of two days only to falsely implicate the petitioner in the present occurrence.
5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances that the petitioner has clean antecedent, injury received by the injured person in simple in nature and F.I.R has been lodged after delay of about two days, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial MagistrateII, Patna in connection with Sachiwalaya P.S. Case No. 119 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and with other following conditions:- i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79564 of 2025(2) dt.11-12-2025 3/3 properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Vanisha/- U T