Guddu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80337 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-336 Year-2025 Thana- MAJHAULIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.
Guddu Kumar Son of Late Bihari Sahni R/o Village - Bahuarwa, Ward no. 04, P.S - Majhauliya, Police station - Yogapatti, District - West Champaran. 2.
Rekha Devi Wife of Subhash Sahni R/o Village - Bahuarwa, Ward no. 04, P.S - Majhauliya, Police station - Yogapatti, District - West Champaran. 3.
Manju Devi Wife of Rajeshwar Sahni R/o Village - Bahuarwa, Ward no. 04, P.S - Majhauliya, Police station - Yogapatti, District - West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Brij Kishor Mishra, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 09-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 74, 109(1), 352, 351(3), 3(5)of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners no. 1 and 3 have antecedent of one case and petitioner no. 2 is a person of clean antecedent and petitioner no. 2 and 3 are women and the informant alleges that Guddu assaulted her by an iron rod causing injury on head, while
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80337 of 2025(2) dt.09-12-2025 2/3 Subash assaulted her by bhala causing injury on head and Rekha snatched her gold chain. Further, Subash and Bali assaulted her husband all over his body, next alleges that accused were accusing her of encroaching the land.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that on account of dispute related to land the alleged occurrence took place. It is next submitted that since the side of the informant encroached the land as such an altercation took place in which both sides assaulted each other. It is also submitted that the injury suffered by the injured has been opined to be simple in nature and petitioners are not criminals.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80337 of 2025(2) dt.09-12-2025 3/3 amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Majhauliya P.S. Case No. 336 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Siddharth Soni/- U T