Ravi Kumar @ Sumit Raj v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.58835 of 2018 Arising Out of P.S.Case No. -111 Year- 2018 Thana -KHIJARSARAI District- GAYA ====================================================== Ravi Kumar @ Sumit Raj, Son of Suryadev Paswan, Resident of VillageChhotaki Nawada, P.S.- Delha, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Fahimuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-10-2018 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is in custody in connection with Khizarsarai P.S.Case No.111 of 2018 registered for an offence under Section 395 of the IPC.

As per FIR, six unknown miscreants committed road robbery and snatched mobile and other articles from the truck driver.

It has been submitted that the petitioner is neither named in the FIR nor any incriminating material has been recovered from his possession. In course of investigation, the police has implicated this petitioner with an ulterior motive. One of the coaccused Pintu Paswan has been allowed bail by the Additional Sessions Judge-VII, Gaya in B.P.No.30 of 2018/1791 of 2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58835 of 2018 (2) dt.06-10-2018 2/2 The petitioner is in custody since 24.07.2018 having clean antecedent.

The learned APP opposed the submissions.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, prayer for bail is allowed. Let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of ACJM-IV, Gaya in connection with Khizarsarai P.S.Case No.111 of 2018 with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Sanjay Kumar, J) B.Kr./- U T