Patna High CourtCR. MISC./83325/2023dismissed

Raj Paswan @ Rdx Raj v. The State Of Bihar

2024-03-07Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83325 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2023 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.

Raj Paswan @ Rdx Raj S/O Ram Vilas Paswan R/O Village- Musapur, P.S.- Bahadurpur, District- Darbhanga 2.

Priyanshu Kumar @ Priyanshu S/O Rakesh Choudhary R/O VillageBajitpur, P.S.- Nagar, District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Giri, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, Advocate For the Informant :

Mr. Kumar Harshvardhan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 07-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 41 of 2023, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 376D, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 4 and 6 of POCSO Act.

3. As per allegation, when the informant (victim) was returning home after attending her class, the petitioners forcibly got her seated on the motorcycle and thereafter, snatched her mobile and brought her to a hotel named R.R. Palace, Laheriasarai where co-accused Vipul was already present. Further, the petitioners along with other accused persons

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83325 of 2023(3) dt.07-03-2024 2/2 committed rape upon her. The victim further alleged that she was taken to Samastipur, where she was drugged with an injection on her right hand as a result of which, she became unconscious and again the accused persons committed gang rape upon.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are the person of clean antecedent and they falsely been implicated in this case.

5. Learned APP has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

6. In view of the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

7. Accordingly, this bail petition stands rejected. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Sudha/- U T