← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./81104/2025allowed

Najare Alam v. The State Of Bihar

2025-12-03Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81104 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-871 Year-2025 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Najare Alam, Son of Akhatar Khalifa @ Akhtar Khalifa, R/o village - Kaila Jalalpur, P.S. - Goraul, Dist. - Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Sharda Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 03-12-2025 Heard Mr. Santosh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Sharda Kumari, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 871 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 8/20(b)(ii) (B) of N.D.P.S. Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that from the possession of this petitioner, 9.6 Kg of ganja was recovered. On being asked, he disclosed that he was carrying this ganja for one co-accused Arbind Kumar.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He is only the carrier. In any view of the matter, the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81104 of 2025(2) dt.03-12-2025 2/2 recovery has made from the possession of this petitioner, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the amount of the contraband which has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner is though more than small quantity but is much less than than commercial quantity. Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 25.06.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Exclusive Special Court 1st (NDPS) Civil Court, Muzaffarpur in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 871 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T