Patna High CourtCR. MISC./79669/2019bail granted

Amit Kumar Sah @ Manda @ Amit Sah@ Amit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2020-01-16Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79669 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-148 Year-2019 Thana- BHAGALPUR KOTWALI DistrictBhagalpur ====================================================== AMIT KUMAR SAH @ MANDA @ AMIT SAH @ AMIT KUMAR, Son of Hari Prasad Sah, Resident of Mohalla - Patel Babu Road, Mundichak, P.S. Tilkamanjhi (Kotwali), District - Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajive Ranjan Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Vinod Shanker Modi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 384, 385, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Informant has alleged that while he was leaving after closing his shop, petitioner snatched Rs.17,00/- and thereafter demanded Rs.2,000/- to be paid every month as rangdari. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case due to business rivalry. Petitioner is in custody since 20.07.2019. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79669 of 2019(3) dt.16-01-2020 2/2 amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 148 of 2019 with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T