Mithun Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80480 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-153 Year-2025 Thana- Raghunathpur District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Mithun Manjhi S/O Narayan Manjhi Resident of Village- Majurahan, P.S.- Raghunathpur, District- East Champaran.

2.

Toofan Manjhi @ Pawan Kumar Son of Narayan Manjhi Resident of Village- Majurahan, P.S.- Raghunathpur, District- East Champaran. 3.

Subhash Manjhi Son of Jugesar Manjhi @ Bahugesar Manjhi @ Chandeshwar Manjhi. Resident of Village- Majurahan, P.S.- Raghunathpur, District- East Champaran.

4.

Sanju Devi wife of Suresh Manjhi. Resident of Village- Majurahan, P.S.- Raghunathpur, District- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Karandeep Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 10-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 352, 351(3), 109, 118(1) and 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and petitioner no.4 is a woman and the informant alleges that the accused persons on 05.06.2025 at 10:30 p.m. came to his house and started assaulting his daughter-in-laws and when he tried to intervene,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80480 of 2025(2) dt.10-12-2025 2/3 the accused persons assaulted him also and Mithun Manjhi assaulted by farsa causing injury on head.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that son of the informant had acted inappropriately with the sister of petitioner no.3 for which Raghunathpur P.S. Case No.152 of 2025, dated 07.06.2025 was instituted by the side of the petitioners against the son of the informant and others, as such, the instant FIR is a counter blast. It is also submitted that since the son of the informant had acted inappropriately with the sister of petitioner no.3, hence, an altercation took place and both sides assaulted each other.

5. The learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, let petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80480 of 2025(2) dt.10-12-2025 3/3 Raghunathpur P.S. Case No.153 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Sanjay/- U T