Yugal Paswan @ Jugal Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74103 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-252 Year-2019 Thana- RAHUI District- Nalanda ====================================================== YUGAL PASWAN @ JUGAL PASWAN Son of Ram Lagan Paswan Resident of Village-Pesaur, P.S.-Rahui, District-Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Alok Kumar @ Alok Kr Shahi For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Jai Narain Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner apprehend his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 324, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Informant in his fardbeyan has alleged that on 06.07.2019 his deceased son Dharmraj Paswan had gone to the residence of petitioner as on next day marriage of his daughter was to be solemnized and when all were busy in preparation of said marriage he came to know that his son has suffered injury from Air-gun. It has further been stated that Dharmraj Paswan,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74103 of 2019(2) dt.22-01-2020 2/3 Surat Paswan, Yugal Paswan and Mukesh Paswan were also present and after hearing the news when he went to the house of petitioner he found two persons carrying his son in an injured condition and was being carried to the clinic of private Doctor where he was declared brought dead. Informant suspects that his son has been killed by petitioner and co-accused Mukesh Paswan, Dharmendra Paswan and Surat Paswan.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case due to village rivalry and animosity. There is no motive assigned for killing the son of Informant and there is no specific allegation against petitioner of causing any Air-gun injury on deceased. Injury appears to be accidental. It is further submitted that petitioner was busy in preparation of marriage of his daughter as such it cannot be expected that he would indulge in any such type of activity. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his/her arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74103 of 2019(2) dt.22-01-2020 3/3 case is pending, in connection with Rahui P.S. Case No. 252 of 2019, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U