Ramswaroop Yadav @ Ramroop Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.64508 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-85 Year-1992 Thana- RAJAOLI District- Nawada ======================================================

1. RAMSWAROOP YADAV @ RAMROOP YADAV S/o Mangar Yadav.

2. Kuldeep Yadav, S/o Shyam Yadav. Both Resident of VillageAmbatri, P.S. Rajauli, District- Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Birendra Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-11-2018 The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 85/1992 corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 183/1999/654/2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 325, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

This is case of misuse of privilege of bail. It appears that after closing the evidence case, 22.05.2015 was fixed for recording the statement of accused persons under Section 313 Cr.P.C., but the petitioner did not appear and thereafter, his bail bond was cancelled. After two years, he has been arrested. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is in custody for three months and the court is vacant and he is ready to abide by any condition imposed on him.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.64508 of 2018(3) dt.20-11-2018 2/2 Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner above-named, however, the District & Sessions Judge, Nawada is directed to send the case to the running court, so that the same be concluded within a period of six months. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) vinita/- U