Anil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.67248 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-119 Year-2005 Thana- MUFFASIL District- West Champaran ====================================================== Anil Kumar S/o Ramvilash Rai Resident of Village-Bairiya,P.S. Gourichak,Distt.-Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Dharmendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sri Pranav Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 22-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in Mufassil P. S. Case No. 119 of 2005 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 420, 406, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that this is a case of misuse of privilege of bail. From the impugned order, it appears that petitioner is in custody since 11.4.2018. It is further mentioned in the impugned order that permanent warrant of arrest has been issued against this petitioner on 14.11.2014 and he has been declared absconder.
This Court is of the view that petitioner has been sufficiently punished for the latches on his part.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.67248 of 2018(2) dt.22-11-2018 2/2 Considering the aforesaid, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the SDJM, Bettiah (West Champaran) in connection with Bettiah (Mufassil) P. S. Case No. 119 of 2005, Trial no. 861 of 2013 subject to the following conditions:- (i) Both the bailers shall be the close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) The petitioner shall be present on each and every date fixed by the Court and absence on two consecutive dates without valid reason will result in cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.
(iii) If petitioner tamper with the evidence in the case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/- U T