← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./75142/2019bail rejected

Vikash Kumar @ Kailu v. The State Of Bihar

2020-03-19Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75142 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-382 Year-2017 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada ====================================================== VIKASH KUMAR @ KAILU, aged about 27 years, Male, Son of Vijay Singh Resident of Village- Gonawan Dih, P.S.- Nawada, District- Nawada ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

M/s Soni Srivastava & Ram Prawesh Kumar, Advs. For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Md. Iftekhar Mahmood, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 19-03-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the state.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Nawada Town P.S. Case No. 382 of 2017, registered under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code, 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, 25(1-b)a and 26 of the Arms Act and 20 and 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, pending in the Court of the District & Sessions Judge, Nawada. The accusation is of recovery of two country made stain-guns, three country made pistols, six live cartridges, nine liters of Indian made foreign liquor and two kilogram of ganja from the joint house of the petitioner.

Submission is that the petitioner is in custody since 17.07.2019 and co-accused, Kamlesh Kumar and Mukesh Kumar have already been allowed the privilege of bail vide Cr.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75142 of 2019(3) dt.19-03-2020 2/2 Misc. No. 15400 of 2020 on 03.03.2020.

The petitioner appears to be accused in six cases, as detailed in paragraph 3 to this application.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner for the present. The prayer for bail is rejected.

However, the petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after one year in custody. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Shamshad/- U T