Amrendra Pratap v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.63081 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -245 Year- 2018 Thana -GAYA MUFASIL District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Amrendra Pratap Son of Siyasaran Prasad @ Siyasaran Yadav Residentof Village- Nanho Bigha, Police Station-Atari,Distt.-Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rabindra Kumar Priyadarshi For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-10-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Muffasil P.S.Case no.245 of 2018 dated 20.7.2018 registered for offences punishable under Sections 379, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner as per FIR is that the police arrested two persons including the petitioner and from other accused person one ATM and Rs.20,000/- were recovered and from the possession of the petitioner one Samsung mobile has been recovered.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is a student and he has been falsely implicated in this case, having no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.63081 of 2018 (2) dt.25-10-2018 2/2 22.7.2018. The charge sheet has already been submitted. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Gaya in connection with Muffasil P.S.case No.245 of 2018.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T