Lal Babu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82004 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-282 Year-2023 Thana- Arwal District- Arwal ====================================================== 1.

Lal Babu Singh Son of Late Baijnath Singh Resident of Village-Motha, P.S. -Arwal, Dist.- Arwal.

2.

Sumitra Devi @ Sumintra Devi Wife of Lal Babu Singh Resident of VillageMotha, P.S. -Arwal, Dist.- Arwal. 3.

Raushan Kumar Son of Lal Babu Singh Resident of Village-Motha, P.S. -Arwal, Dist.- Arwal.

4.

Sonva Devi Wife of Babban Singh @ Babban Kumar Resident of VillageMotha, P.S. -Arwal, Dist.- Arwal. 5.

Babban Kumar @ Babban Singh Son of Late Baijnath Singh Resident of Village-Motha, P.S. -Arwal, Dist.- Arwal.

6.

Prince Kumar Son of Manoj Kumar Resident of Village - Rampur, P.S. -Arwal, Dist.- Arwal.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Dubey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 02-12-2025 Heard learned Advocate for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Arwal P.S. Case No. 282 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 307 and 341 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. On the fateful day, while the informant came to his home after grazing the buffalo, all the petitioners surrounded

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82004 of 2025(2) dt.02-12-2025 2/3 him and brutally assaulted by means of lathi and danda causing head and cut injury. There is further allegation of pelting stones over other family members, who came to rescue of the informant.

4. Learned Advocate for the petitioners submitted that in fact, both the parties are agnates and they were bickering over a partition dispute for ancestral properties. There is a counter version of the present case being Arwal P.S. Case No.283 of 2023 instituted against the informant and others. On the fateful day, in fact, both the parties entered into free-fight resulted into injuries to the persons of both the sides. Moreover, the injuries, which are allegedly sustained to the informant, are concerned, the same is found to be simple in nature.To support the aforesaid contention, the injury report is placed on record, as AnnexureP/3. The petitioners are persons of fair antecedent and undertake that they will fully co-operate in the proceeding of the Court.

5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.

6. Having considered the submissions advanced by the learned Advocate for the respective parties and taking note of the factum of case and counter case coupled with the simple nature of injury besides the fair antecedent of the petitioners,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82004 of 2025(2) dt.02-12-2025 3/3 let, the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Arwal in connection with Arwal P.S. Case No. 282 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, with further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioners.

(Harish Kumar, J) shailendra/- U T