Manu Patel v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.64280 of 2018 ======================================================
1. Manu Patel, S/o Prabhu Patel, R/o Village-Gambhirpur, P.S.-Nautan, District-Siwan.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajiv Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amitesh Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with B.P.No. 740 of 2018 arising out of Nautan P.S.Case No. 31 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 399, 402 , 413 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code and 25 (1-b)A, 26 and 35 Arms Act.
Allegation against the petitioner as per F.I.R. is of recovery of one live cartridge, one knife, ATM of SBI, Adhar Car and mobiles from the possession of the miscreants and accordingly, seizure list has been prepared.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the name of the petitioner transpires on the confessional statement of co-accused and the petitioner is an accused in another case bearing Nautan P.S.Case No. 23 of 2018 but he is on bail and in the present case, charge sheet has been submitted against the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.64280 of 2018 (2) dt.25-10-2018 2/2 petitioner and he is in custody since 26.07.2018. Heard learned A.P.P also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- ( Rupees Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in Nautan P.S.Case No. 31 of 2018, subject to the following conditions:- i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
iii) It is made clear that if petitioner found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T