← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./81315/2025bail granted

Veersen @ Sonu v. The State Of Bihar

2025-12-10Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81315 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-184 Year-2025 Thana- SARMERA District- Nalanda ====================================================== Veersen @ Sonu S/o Raj Kumar Prasad @ Ragho Kewat R/o vill - Gaushnagar, P.S.- Sarmera, Distt.- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Bhola Prasad For the State :

Mr.Ram Sevak Choudhary For the Informant :

Mr.Basant Kumar & Mr. Rajesh Kr. Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 137(2), 140(3) of the B.N.S. and later on, Sections 103(1), 140(1), 61(2) and 238 of the B.N.S. were added.

3. As per prosecution case, on 02.08.2025, brother of informant went outside but did not return and later, his dead body was found. Informant believes that all the F.I.R. named accused persons committed murder of his brother.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that name of petitioner transpired in the re-statement of informant. Only material, which has come against petitioner, is that it was

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81315 of 2025(3) dt.10-12-2025 2/2 this petitioner who called the deceased. There is no other direct or indirect evidence against petitioner to show his complicity in the occurrence. Similarly situated co-accused has been granted bail by this Court, vide order dated 03.12.2025 passed in Cr.Misc. No. 82613 of 2025. Petitioner has got clean antecedent and is in custody since 08.08.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant have opposed the prayer for bail.

6. In the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody and clean antecedent, the prayer for bail of petitioner is allowed.

7. Accordingly, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Sarmera P.S. Case No. 184 of 2025.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T