Sunil Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.65749 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -6 Year- 2018 Thana -TISIAUTA District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Sunil Das, Son of Fauzdar Das, Resident of Village- Subhankarpur, Tikauli, Police Station- Tisiauta in the District of Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mustaque Alam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Tisiauta P.S. Case No. 06/2018, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366(A) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner and other co-accused persons is that they kidnapped informant's daughter with bad intention. They also threatened him not to complain otherwise they will kill him and his daughter.

It has been submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. There is love affair between the petitioner and victim girl and she herself left her house and went along with the petitioner. They also solemnized marriage and are living as husband and wife. The girl is minor as per medical report.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.65749 of 2018 (2) dt.06-11-2018 2/2 Moreover, other co-accused have been granted bail vide order dated 06.08.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 39748/2018. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He is in custody since 12.03.2018.

Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate IX, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Tisiauta P.S. Case No. 06/2018, subject to the conditions:

(1.) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2.) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3.) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Vinita/- U T