Patna High CourtCR. MISC./84075/2024dismissed

Tuntun Singh @ Tuntun Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-12-16Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84075 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-458 Year-2022 Thana- BANIAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== TUNTUN SINGH @ TUNTUN KUMAR SINGH S/o- Hem Narayan singh Village- Berui Ps-Baniyapur Dist-Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Krishna Kumar Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 16-12-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Baniyapur P.S. Case No. 458 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 120B and 506 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of learned C.J.M., Saran at Chapra.

3. The petitioner in association of other co-accused duped the money of the informant.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case by the informant to pressurize towards getting his money return back whereas the petitioner has no concern with the alleged transaction of money. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84075 of 2024(2) dt.16-12-2024 2/2 omnibus in nature. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposing the bail petition submitted that considering the nature of the offence, the petitioner does not deserve anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of case and the nature of the allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

7. However, if the petitioner surrenders before the learned Court below within six weeks from today and seek regular bail, the learned Court below would pass order in accordance with law without being prejudiced by this order.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T