← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/4680/2019disposed

Yogendra Prasad Singh, v. The State Of Bihar

2026-05-07Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4680 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19135 of 2014 ====================================================== Yogendra Prasad Singh, S/o Late Matukdhari Singh, R/o House No. 1/10, Vivekanand Marg, North Sri Krishna Puri, P.S. Sri Krishnapuri, District Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, namely Sri Deepak Kumar, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Sri Amrit Lal Meena, the Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Vishveshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

3.

Sri S. Siddharth, the Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

Sri Mithilesh Kumar, the Deputy Secretary (Vigilance), Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Vishveshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

5.

Sri Ratnesh Kumar, the Joint Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Vishveshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 6.

Dr. Nilotpal Goswami, the Accountant General, Beer Chand Patel Path, R. Block, Patna, Bihar.

7.

Sri Pradeep Kumar Singh, the Senior Accounts Officer, Accountant General, Beer Chand Patel path, R Block, Patna, Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kumar Kaushik, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Raj Ballabh Prasad Yadav (Aag 11) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 07-05-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s) "for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties for

Patna High Court MJC No.4680 of 2019(5) dt.07-05-2026 2/2 their willful disobedience of the order dated 18.02.2019 passed in CWJC No.19135 of 2014."

3.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case has become infructuous as the writ court's order has been set aside by the appellate bench.

4. In that background, the present contempt petition stands disposed of.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U