Md. Parvana v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84001 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-543 Year-2022 Thana- NAANPUR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Md. Parvana son of Md. Rahmat, resident of Village -Lohaitha, Ward No 14, P.S. -Nanpur, District -Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vikash Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 27-02-2025 Heard Mr. Vikash Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, learned APP for the State.
2. This is the third attempt of the petitioner to approach before this Court for bail. Earlier, vide detailed order dated 27.06.2023 and 09.02.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 18141 of 2023 and Cr. Misc. No.82405 of 2023, the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected.
3. Vide order dated 24.01.2025, a report was called for from the learned Court below regarding the stage of the trial and the time likely to be taken in conclusion of the trial. In compliance thereof, a report dated 05.02.2025 has been sent by the learned A.D.J.-III, Sitamarhi, which is at Flag 'R' to this application. In his report, the learned Judge has, inter alia,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84001 of 2024(3) dt.27-02-2025 2/2 stated that the trial would be concluded within three months if both parties of this case cooperates the Court.
4. Considering the report aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for bail is hereby once again rejected.
5. The learned Trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three months and both the parties are directed to co-operate in the trial.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T