Bablu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87430 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-344 Year-2024 Thana- LAXMIPUR District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.

Bablu Yadav S/o Bhuto Yadav R/o Village - Shivsona, P.S- Laxmipur, Distt.- Jamui.

2.

Indradeo Yadav S/o Bhuto Yadav R/o Village - Shivsona, P.S- Laxmipur, Distt.- Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prakash Mahto, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar Pandey, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-04-2026 At the outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners informs that the petitioner no.2 has been arrested during the pendency of the bail application, as such, he seeks to withdraw the prayer for bail on behalf of petitioner no.2 Indradeo Yadav.

2. In view of the above, the prayer for bail on behalf of petitioner no.2 Indradeo Yadav stands dismissed as withdrawn.

3. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner no.1 and learned APP for the State.

4. The petitioner no.1 seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Laxmipur P.S. Case No. 344 of 2024 registered

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87430 of 2025(4) dt.07-04-2026 2/3 for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 351(2), 352 and 117(1) of BNS.

5. As per the allegation made in the F.I.R., the petitioners are said to have assaulted the informant by means of farsa and iron rod causing head injury.

6. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner no.1 submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the case due to land dispute and past enmity. The parties are agnates. Though the injuries are grievous, but the same is not attributable to petitioner no.1.

7. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner no.1.

8. Having heard the rival submissions made by the parties, as well as, having perused the allegation made in the F.I.R., though the injuries are grievous, but the same is not attributable to the petitioner no.1 Bablu Yadav, the parties are agnates and there is land dispute between them, the petitioner no.1 Bablu Yadav is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87430 of 2025(4) dt.07-04-2026 3/3 Class, Jamui in connection with Laxmipur P.S. Case No. 344 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C / 482(2) BNSS.

9. The District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner no.1 and if it is found that the petitioner no.1 is involved in some other cases as what has been stated in Para-3 of the bail petition, this order will automatically lose its force.

10. The bail application stands disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) mantreshwar/- U T