Manjeet Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84278 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-371 Year-2023 Thana- BOCHAHAN District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Manjeet Sah S/o Ram Chandra Sah R/o Village Dahiban Tole Adigopalpur, PS Bochahan, District-Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Hari Kishore Thakur, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Veena Kumari Jaiswal, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 12-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 342, 323, 324, 307, 447, 448, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other co-accused persons have assaulted the informant and his family members due to previous enmity regarding the land. It is further alleged that there is specific allegation of assaulting on the head of the informant with kulhari due to which informant sustained head injury and petitioner also assaulted on stomach of father of the informant with kulhari.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence as alleged. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84278 of 2023(2) dt.12-01-2024 2/2 against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is admitted land dispute between the parties. Both parties have sustained injury. Injury of father of the informant is simple in nature and no injury report is prepared by the doctor regarding the injury of the informant. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the fact that there is admitted land dispute between the parties and clean antecedent, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Bochahan P.S. Case No. 371 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) annpurna/- U T