Bittu Singh @ Bittu Kumar Singh @ Suman Kumar Singh @ Bittu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76020 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-120 Year-2017 Thana- EKMA District- Saran ====================================================== BITTU SINGH @ BITTU KUMAR SINGH @ SUMAN KUMAR SINGH @ BITTU KUMAR Son of Bashishtha Singh Resident of Village-Semri, P.SMashrakh, District-Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Alok Kumar Alok For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 25-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner apprehend his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 379, 386/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Informant in his written complaint has alleged that on 30.04.2017 his bus departed with barat for Siwan and while returning on 01.05.2017, petitioner and other FIR named accused stopped the Bus and demanded sum of Rs. 20,000/- as ransom and thereafter forcibly took away the Bus. It has been submitted on behalf of petitioner that the Bus owner had taken loan from the Finance Company and same was due and for non payment of which the Finance Company took away the Bus. However, the Bus was released in favour of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76020 of 2019(2) dt.25-11-2019 2/2 Informant by the Finance Company. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending, in connection with Ekma P.S. Case No. 120 of 2017, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U