Md. Naushad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.69557 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-326 Year-2018 Thana- ALAMGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== Md. Naushad, aged about 20 years, S/o Md. Hasim R/o Gaighat, Jhoparpati, Bakho Tola, P.S.- Alamganj, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Kritu Verma For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ahmad Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 05-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner seeks bail in Alamganj P.S. Case No.326 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 394 of the Indian Penal Code.
Informant has alleged that when he was returning back on 25.06.2018 at 4 a.m., he was intercepted by one unknown person and on strength of knife, he dragged him and, thereafter, three more accused also came along with knife and looted his purse and other articles.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. Name of the petitioner has surfaced on the basis of confession made by co-accused, Munna Bakho.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.69557 of 2018(2) dt.05-12-2018 2/2 the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., 1st -cumSub-Judge 1st , Patnacity, Patna in connection with Alamganj P.S. Case No.326 of 2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T