Balak Poddar @ Ram Balak Poddar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83925 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-382 Year-2013 Thana- SHAHPUR PATORI District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1.

Balak Poddar @ Ram Balak Poddar S/o- Mahesh Poddar @ Maheshwar Poddar village -Chaksalem, Police station - Patori ,District -Samastipur 2.

Shekhar Poddar @ Chandra Chandra Shekhar Kumar Pauddar S/oRampukar Poddar @ Ram Kumar Poddar village -Chaksalem, Police station - Patori ,District -Samastipur 3.

Rajesh Poddar @ Rajesh Kumar Poddar @ Rajeev Kumar S/o- Rampukar Poddar @ Ram Kumar Poddar village -Chaksalem, Police station - Patori ,District -Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mahendra Pratap, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 16-12-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioners in this application pray for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending their arrest in connection with Shahpur Patori P.S. Case no.382 of 2013 registered for the offence punishable under sections 307, 341, 323, 324, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, while the petitioner nos. 1 and 2 caught hold of Amardeep Kumar it is stated that petitioner no.3 assaulted the informant brutally with an iron rod leading to grievious injury.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83925 of 2024(2) dt.16-12-2024 2/2 the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case. No such offence has been committed by them. The petitioners and the informant are shopkeepers dealing in garments and having shops next to each other.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation in the F.I.R., there being specific allegation against the petitioners and in an FIR registered in the year 2013 the anticipatory bail application having been filed 11 years later in the year 2024, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail and the application is rejected.

7. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the learned Court blow within a period of four weeks. (Partha Sarthy, J) Bibhash/- U T