← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/19148/2025dismissed

Sanjay Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-27Mr. Justice A. Abhishek Reddy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19148 of 2025 ====================================================== Sanjay Singh, Son of Late Bidya Nath Singh, Resident of Kadamkuan, Bara Fathak, West Lohanipur, P.S. and P.O.- Kadamkuan, District- Patna, Office at Singh and Associates, Biscomaun Bhawan, Ground Floor, South Block, West Gandhi Maidan, Patna- 800001, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, General Administrative Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The District Magistrate, Patna.

5.

The Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajni Kant Singh, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Anjani Kumar, AAG 4 For the PMC Mr. Prasoon Sinha, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER 27-11-2025 The prayer sought for in the petition filed by the writ petitioner seeks a general direction to the respondents-Patna Municipal Corporation seeking demolition of the un-authorised buildings which are existing in Pirmohani, Lohanipur, Railway Hundar Road, Lalji Tola.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction of the respondents-authorities in spite of giving a representation to them and also a direction given vide letter no. 9224 dated

Patna High Court CWJC No.19148 of 2025(2) dt.27-11-2025 2/2 25.08.2025 (Annexure P/3) asking the Municipal Commissioner to take necessary action.

3. This Court is of the opinion that the petitioner has to file a Public Interest Litigation as he is not seeking any specific direction for removal of any un-authorised construction of his neighbour.

4. Having regard to the same, the present writ petition is dismissed with a liberty to move the Public Interest Litigation if he so advised.

(A. Abhishek Reddy , J) Bhardwaj/- U