Ajit Yadav @ Vikat Kumar @ Vikrant Kumar @ Vikant Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83346 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-54 Year-2023 Thana- BISHUNPUR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Ajit Yadav @ Vikat Kumar @ Vikrant Kumar @ Vikant Kumar S/O Prem Lal Yadav R/O Village- Bharaul, P.S- Bishanpur, Distt.- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Girish Chandra Jha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Gauri Shankar Gupta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 08-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Bishanpur P.S. Case No. 54 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, pending in the Court of learned A.C.J.M. IX, Darbhanga.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is said to have opened fire upon Mithilesh Yadav (deceased).
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that the petitioner has no concern with the informant and the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83346 of 2023(2) dt.08-01-2024 2/2 petitioner is resident of other village but some co-accused are co-villager of the informant. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposing the bail petition submitted that the petitioner is the main assailant. Hence, he does not deserve privilege of anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of case and the nature of the offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T