← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/23450/2019withdrawn

Ram Ekbal Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-01-04The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23450 of 2019 ====================================================== Ram Ekbal Singh Son of Late Bhagwan Rai Resident of Village and P.O.- Darwan, P.S.-Ramgarh, District-Kaimur (Bhabhua). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Kaimur, Bhabhua, District-Bhabhua.

2.

The District Certificate Officer, Bhabhua, Kaimur, District-Kaimur 3.

The Senior Manager, Punjab National Bank, Godsadda Branch, P.S.-Kaimur, District Bhahua.

4.

The Punjab National Bank through the Zonal Office, Ara, District-Ara. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satyendra Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar, AC to GP-24 Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate Ms. Shilpi Singh, Advocate Mr. Vibhuti Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 04-01-2023 Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s): "i. That the present writ application is being filed in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the Certificate Case No. 20(B) of 2014-15 issued by the District Certificate Officer, Kaimur, Bhabhua; on the ground that the certificate case number is not present in the certificate (Annexure-2/A) and the entire certificate proceeding is without jurisdiction, there is no written instrument;

ii. That the present writ application is

Patna High Court CWJC No.23450 of 2019(3) dt.04-01-2023 2/2 being filed in the nature of Mandamus for a direction to the bank authorities to proceed against the petitioner in accordance;

iii. For any other relief/Reliefs for which the petitioner is entitled for."

Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, states that, in view of the intervening developments, the petition may be permitted to be withdrawn.

Prayer allowed.

Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

Interlocutory application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Partha Sarthy, J) DKS/KC U