← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./81934/2025bail granted

Abhay Bhushan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2026-03-13Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81934 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-333 Year-2025 Thana- BIBHUTIPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Abhay Bhushan Singh S/o Barun Kumar Singh Resident of Village-Mahathi, PS- Bibhulipur, District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar, A.P.P.

For the Informant :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and the State.

2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 64(1), 83, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per F.I.R., informant alleged that on pretext promise of marriage, this petitioner established physical relation with her and thereafter, refused to marry.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that entire case as set out in the F.I.R. is false and concocted. Informant was fully aware of the consequences of such relationship which continued for more than five years. He further submits that acts of repeated intimacy and sexual

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81934 of 2025(5) dt.13-03-2026 2/2 relationship was consensual in nature and was not established under any false promise, threat or coercion and such, the same cannot be said to be induced or involuntary. As a matter of fact, it is a case of prolonged love affair between two parties which has been given a colour of forcible sexual intercourse with oblique purpose and motive. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

5. Learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail application.

6. Considering the backdrop of the case, nature of accusation and clean antecedent, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bailbond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Rosera, Samastipur in connection with Vibhutipur P. S. Case No. 333 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T