Md. Nasim @ Nasim @ Naseem v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84949 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-111 Year-2024 Thana- PIRBAHOR District- Patna ====================================================== Md. Nasim @ Nasim @ Naseem Son of Md. Kalim Resident of MohallaSabjibagh, P.S.- Pirbahore, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Madhav Raj For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pranav Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Allegation is of indiscriminate firing against the petitioner and other F.I.R. named accused persons, as a result of which, informant and one Hamad sustained gun-shot injury.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from bare perusal of the F.I.R., it transpires that two groups were abusing each other and were indulged in some dispute, in the meantime, the informant reached there and tried to disperse both the groups and there was firing from both the sides and in due course, the informant sustained fire-arm injury in his chest.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84949 of 2024(2) dt.27-03-2025 2/2 It is not the case of the informant that this petitioner caused any gun shot injury. 13 named and 10-15 unknown persons made indiscriminate firing and as such, it is very difficult to come to a definite conclusion as to who caused gun shot injury to informant and one Hamad. Learned counsel further submits that later on, realizing the mistake, both parties have entered into a compromise. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest/surrender before the Court below within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Patna in connection with Pirbahore P.S. Case No. 111 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T