Laxman Sharma @ Lakshman Sharma v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85176 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2024 Thana- SIKARPUR District- West Champaran ====================================================== Laxman Sharma @ Lakshman Sharma S/o Raghunath Sharma R/o VillageRampur Sakraul, P.S.- Shikarpur, District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Milind Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-01-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 354, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant on account of existing dispute. It is next submitted that the informant alleges that petitioner assaulted the informant by farsa on head causing injury. It is next submitted that the injury was found grievous, but then the blow was not repeated. It is also submitted that petitioner is in custody since 17.10.2024 and charge sheet has been submitted as such no useful purpose would be served by
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85176 of 2024(2) dt.24-01-2025 2/2 keeping the petitioner in jail. It is further submitted that petitioner had earlier moved this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Criminal Miscellaneous No. 47590 of 2024 and the same was permitted to be withdrawn.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Shikarpur P.S. Case No. 29 of 2024.
6. However, it is made clear that if the learned Trial Court comes to a conclusion that petitioner, after his release, is trying to delay the trial in any manner, in that event the learned Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner forthwith after recording reasons. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T