Patna High CourtCR. MISC./78035/2018bail granted

Md. Guddu v. The State Of Bihar

2019-01-07Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.78035 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-94 Year-2018 Thana- JOGBANI District- Araria ====================================================== Md. Guddu S/o Md. Erfan, R/o Vill.- Haji Mohalla, Ward No. 07, P.S.- Jogbani, District- Araria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mrigendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mustaque Alam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Jogbani P.S. Case No. 94 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 413 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is recovery of two stolen mobile from his possession.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case due to village politics. Petitioner is in custody since 16.04.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M. Araria in connection with Jogbani P.S. Case No. 94 of 2018, with

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.78035 of 2018(2) dt.07-01-2019 2/2 following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T